Re: [IRTF-Announce] Consultation on early switch of IETF 110 to an online meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hiya,

Given the constraints, that seems to me to make sense.

If somehow magic happens and we could meet, I might go
to Prague and have beer while attending remotely, but
yeah, that's not a reason to risk those costs;-)

Thanks also for asking for comment,
S.


On 14/09/2020 23:49, IETF Executive Director wrote:
> The IETF Administration LLC is considering switching IETF 110, due to
> be held in Prague in March 2021, to an online meeting long before the
> meeting and without using the assessment process used for IETF 108
> and IETF 109.  This note is to explain why we are considering this
> action and to ask for community feedback.
> 
> The background to this is firstly that we are still in the midst of a
> pandemic with ongoing major disruption to global travel.  A vaccine
> is expected but the timing cannot be predicted and there are still
> many obstacles to overcome.  In this context, while March 2021 is
> still six months away, the likelihood of a return to normal by then,
> or at least open travel, is low.
> 
> Secondly, for 2020 the IETF LLC was fortunate enough to have both
> pandemic insurance and a strong contractual basis on which to cancel
> in-person meetings in the event of a pandemic.  With that assurance
> we have been able to wait until the last practical moment to decide
> on switching to an online meeting.  However, pandemic insurance is no
> longer available and the contract with the Prague venue does not have
> this protection and requires us to rebook within three years or pay a
> significant cancellation fee.  The restrictions on rebooking are
> quite tight and there is only one set of future meeting dates
> available for us to rebook and avoid the fee.  It is our assessment
> that the longer we wait, the higher the risk that this opportunity to
> rebook without paying the cancellation fee will no longer be
> available.
> 
> We are therefore considering making the decision now to switch IETF
> 110 to an online meeting and rebooking the Prague venue for a later
> meeting.  The alternative of waiting to make the decision until ten
> weeks out following a proper assessment, as we have done with  IETF
> 108 and IETF 109, risks us being subject to a cancellation fee of at
> least $450,000 if the rebooking opportunity has gone.  On the balance
> of probabilities we believe the best course of action is to cancel
> and rebook now.
> 
> We would like to hear what the community has to say on this.  Please
> send any comments either directly to me or to ietf@xxxxxxxx by
> midnight UTC on 28 September.
> 
> Jay
> 

Attachment: 0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux