Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dan,
I have addressed your comments in the revision:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-11 
 
Please see my answers below.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:22 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2020-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-08
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

Ready with Issues

This document defines a YANG data model for the capabilities of various NSFs in
the I2NSF framework to centrally manage the capabilities of the various NSFs.
This is a very clear and well written document, and the use cases and the
examples also help its readability. The document was already reviewed and found
READY for publication by the YANG Doctors, so I did not perform a detailed YANG
review but rather focused on the Gen-ART specific aspects. A couple of issues
should be discussed and clarified before approval.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1. In the introduction:

> This YANG data model is based on the
   information model for I2NSF NSF capabilities
   [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability].

So, the YANG data model is based on [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability], and the YANG
module references [draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-03] and
[I-D.ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection]. However, these three documents are
listed as Informative References. Without them the document cannot be
understood and implemented, so I believe that these reference should be moved
to Normative References.

 => I move the three drafts to the Normative References.
 
2. In the YANG module a few condition capabilities have no REFERENCEs. Where
can the semantics be found?

context-capability
acl-number
application
target
user
group
geography

 =>  I put the references for the above condition capabilities.

Nits/editorial comments:

1. Some of the acronyms are not expanded at first occurrence (VoIP, VoLTE,
DDoS, etc. )
 => I mentioned the full words for the acronyms above and IPS.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul
-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: +82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@xxxxxxxxxpauljeong@xxxxxxxx
Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux