Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-03.txt> (Special Purpose Label terminology) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 28 Aug 2020, at 10:58, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There is a downside: the document clearly needs to be returned to the working group to make this fix, tidy up the rest of the document, and re-establish WG consensus.



I think that is a price worth paying to clear this up.

There is another alternative, but one which will take a while longer and that is to write a standalone document on XL and not muddle it up in label administrative procedure and naming semantics.

Indeed, given that we have all the text, it would not be difficult to craft three very short and to the point drafts that each did a single job.

If you need a ghost editor let me know.

Stewart



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux