It looks like Barry change the "Consensus Required" flag. The history
shortened that to just "Consensus". As far as I can tell, given that
this document is intended for BCP, the document does indeed require IETF
rough consensus. Setting the flag does not represent Barry calling the
consensus, but rather him recording the fact that such a call will be
needed.
Everything looks right.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/26/2020 3:10 PM, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
Hi Murray,
The context is here
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update/history/>
You can see where last week Barry had changed the consensus to Yes. The
change was made between the upload dates of version -02 and -03. It was
actually after the last IETF meeting but I guess now that I think of it,
I only remember Ben asking for a hum on wether or not it was to be AD
sponsored and not a hum for the draft itself. For consensus on the
draft itself, the AD sponsor would have put something on the mailing
list right?
