Dear Mr Daley,
At 01:33 PM 18-08-2020, Jay Daley wrote:
I think you are well aware that this was a mistake that was swiftly corrected
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xMoaLSjq30gxPK4cbqfjAMyJzlM/>https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xMoaLSjq30gxPK4cbqfjAMyJzlM/
I think you are are also well aware that we offered unlimited fee
waivers for IETF 108.
I was surprised by the support on that thread. I did not take up the
offer. I did not use any backdoor even if it was technically
possible to do so.
While both of those had significant missteps on the way, the end
result was a meeting that anyone could participate in and therefore
your description of the situation is far from accurate.
The point was that subscribers can send emails to ietf@ to express
their opinion on issues which may not be apparent. It would be
interesting to compare the list of people who commented about the
so-called "waiver" with the list of people who believe in "inclusiveness".
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
