In article <591c0ee0-d444-3e8b-e4bd-5a9f6ffb518e@xxxxxxxxx> you write: >On a previous occasion when this question was asked, the pragmatic answer >was the "Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx" which basically named >and (mildly) shamed the most frequent or loudest speakers. > >I notice that this summary stopped on 2020-06-12, and it was never sent by >an official IETF tool anyway. > >Perhaps it would be good to have it back, officially. As an experiment I will start posting weekly summaries similar to the ones Thomas used to post. I'm basing them on the IETF's IMAP message archive, using a script you can find here: https://github.com/jrlevine/imapcount After a few weeks we can see if they make things better or worse. If you think there are other lists that might benefit from similar summaries, drop me a private note. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
