Re: [IAB] IAB appeal for arpa assignment

[Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Wes,

Hello IAB members,

Hello IETF members,

I was reminded today about information that I had not previously added to my appeal that I would like to have included.  It is Section 3 of RFC3172  [1].  The last sentence of Section 3 says:

 The "IANA Considerations" section should include the name of the
   subdomain, the rules for how the subdomain is to be administered, and
   the criteria for entries within the subdomain.

I point this out as an admission that the current best practices (BCP 52) were follwed by RFC3405 section 9 [2] and that the zone administration and criteria for entries within the uri.arpa zone stem from the IANA Considerations in section 9.

Thank you,

Tim McSweeney

[1]  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3172
[2]  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3405#section-9

On August 10, 2020 at 6:16 PM Wes Hardaker < wjhns1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Timothy Mcsweeney < tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Hello Wes,

Hello IAB members,

Hello IETF members,

Hello Timothy,

Thanks for answering my questions and submitting an updated version of

your appeal with greater details on exactly what action you are

appealing. The IAB's first meeting since your original submission will

be Wednesday, where your appeal is on the agenda and we'll likely begin

discussing it.

--

Wes Hardaker

USC/ISI