> > I see that the emails from others above expressing *approval* for the IESG > are not receiving correctional visits from the SAA, so I wanted to make sure > that I expressed myself in The Correct Manner moving forward: > > > > I've seen emails on this thread of two sorts so far: > > Quite a few emails have > 1 - Expressed approval of the decision, and > 2 - Not addressed any of the substantive issues from the previous discussion. > > A small number of emails have > 1 - Not expressed approval of the decision, and > 2 - Also discussed the substance of the issues from the previous discussion. > > I propose the likely possibility that variable #2, not variable #1, is > the reason the emails of the latter sort have been addressed by the SAA, > while emails of the former sort have not been. It's just that the > correlation of the two variables has been perfect so far, I think. This email expressed disapproval of the decision without discussing issues of the previous discussion, and this email was not addressed by the SAA: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UQgVv-dkk0uNhWcML8N-7sg_1nw/ Therefore, it is clearly allowed to express disapproval of the decision to end discussion. Barbara
