Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <FA949795-024D-487F-9160-AB123FFC73AF@xxxxxxxxx> you write:
>I think about this as liaisons are there to answer questions about the group they are from (and report
>back on the process to their groups), but otherwise should not be speaking.   Otherwise, they are having
>an undue influence on the NomCom process.

I was the ISOC board liason a few years ago, with my task being to
report back and say whether the nomcom followed their processes.

At the nomcom chair's request I took notes at some of the interviews
so the committee members present could concentrate on interviewing.
When it came time to decide who to pick, I sat in the back and
listened.

R's,
John
 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux