Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@xxxxxxx>, "'Samuel Weiler'" <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:39:52 +0000
Cc: "'ietf@xxxxxxxx'" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e878c2d28aa54906ac8b9450ab8e7515@att.com>
References: <7bc1d0aab066453d967a35e4d44554c1@att.com> <alpine.OSX.2.23.453.2007231941390.17755@samuels-air> <e878c2d28aa54906ac8b9450ab8e7515@att.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401

As I read RFC 8713, in particular 4.9, can't you invite someone to be an advisor, and that part of their duties are to abstain from all votes?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  - From: Victor Kuarsingh

References:
- Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  - From: STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  - From: Samuel Weiler
- RE: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  - From: STARK, BARBARA H

Prev by Date: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Next by Date: Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
Previous by thread: RE: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
Next by thread: Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux