答复: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work

[Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Guntur,

It is very helpful. Thanks very much.

I will go through these liaison and go on to summarize the need for the ETSI Liaison work.

 

 

Best Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)

 

 

 

 

---

发件人: Architecture-discuss [architecture-discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxx] 代表 Guntur Wiseno Putra [gsenopu@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2020年6月29日 11:43
收件人: Rob Sayre
抄送: architecture-discuss@xxxxxxx; Paul Hoffman; IETF discussion list
主题: Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work

Dear Rob &

architecture-discuss,

Adding a collection of references on "ETSI" having not been mentioned so far in this thread:

(By the help of the search engine available at "liaison statements" for "ETSI":)

Total Statements: 94

https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/posted/?text=ETSI&source=&destination=&start_date=&end_date=

Regard,

Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Senin, 29 Juni 2020, Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> menulis:

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:14 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Although there are always layer 8 and 9 reasons for having, or not
having, liaison agreements, ...

Yes. This is the substance of my question. 

thanks,

Rob

PS - I used the word "reviewed", but I should have written "read and commented", since no one asked me to do anything. :)