Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Amazing work, thank you!

thanks,
Rob

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:43 PM Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Rob &
architecture-discuss,


Adding a collection of references on "ETSI" having not been mentioned so far in this thread:

(By the help of the search engine available at "liaison statements" for "ETSI":)
Total Statements: 94


https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/posted/?text=ETSI&source=&destination=&start_date=&end_date=


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Senin, 29 Juni 2020, Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> menulis:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:14 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Although there are always layer 8 and 9 reasons for having, or not
having, liaison agreements, ...

Yes. This is the substance of my question. 

thanks,
Rob

PS - I used the word "reviewed", but I should have written "read and commented", since no one asked me to do anything. :)

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux