It's a mechanism for mitigating the efforts of a few companies to stuff the Nomcom and get their employees on the I*. I'm not sure it's the best way, or sufficient, to assure the independence of leadership bodies but I don't think it's unreasonable.
Melinda
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 17:12 Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 5:40 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I took it the opposite way:
If you do IETF work, and more than 50% of your time is working for "X" then you are considered to be an affiliate of "X"Hmm. I think the IETF policy of treating everyone as an individual makes sense here.It can be difficult to unpack who is actually paying some tiny company or consultant. So, why bother?thanks,Rob
