> -----Original Message----- > From: Watson Ladd [mailto:watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 12:05 PM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: secdir@xxxxxxxx; ippm@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ippm-route.all@xxxxxxxx; > last-call@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08 > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:55 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > <acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <snip> > > > > > > > > Now for the meat: what about the security considerations? Since this > draft is > > > describing enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the > measurements > > > taken by such enhanced traceroutes, the security impact is minimal and > the > > > authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of > > > tracroutes on networks. > > [acm] > > I'm looking for the action implied in your comment. Do we add the > sentences: > > > > This draft describes enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the > measurements taken by such enhanced traceroute tools. The security impact > is minimal and the authors reference the existing RFCs describing the > security impacts of active and hybrid measurements on networks (of which > traceroute measurements are a subset) below. > > My apologies: you read as a suggestion which I thought was a > description. I don't think it has to change at all. [acm] Thanks for your very fast clarification, Watson! Al > > > > > Or? > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Watson Ladd > > > > > > > > -- > "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". > --Rousseau. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
