Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:55 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
<acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
>
> >
> > Now for the meat: what about the security considerations? Since this draft is
> > describing enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the measurements
> > taken by such enhanced traceroutes, the security impact is minimal and the
> > authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of
> > tracroutes on networks.
> [acm]
> I'm looking for the action implied in your comment.  Do we add the sentences:
>
> This draft describes enhancements to traceroute and ways to describe the measurements taken by such enhanced traceroute tools. The security impact is minimal and the authors reference the existing RFCs describing the security impacts of active and hybrid measurements on networks (of which traceroute measurements are a subset) below.

My apologies: you read as a suggestion which I thought was a
description. I don't think it has to change at all.

>
> Or?
>
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Watson Ladd
> >
>


-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux