Hi Les, Would you be opposed to adding text similar to the OSPF paragraph below to the ISIS draft? I think that the OSPF draft does a better job of first introducing UDAs. Having just looked at the ISIS draft, it does seem to somewhat assume that the reader will just know what they are ... I understand that this should resolve Scott's concerns. Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: last-call <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Scott O. Bradner > Sent: 15 June 2020 11:17 > To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: lsr@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@xxxxxxxx; ops- > dir@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-te- > link-attr-reuse-14 > > that looks just fine to me - thanks > > Scott > > > On Jun 15, 2020, at 5:14 AM, Peter Psenak > <ppsenak=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Scott. > > > > there is a following text in the OSPF draft: > > > > "On top of advertising the link attributes for standardized > > applications, link attributes can be advertised for the purpose of > > applications that are not standardized. We call such an > > application a "User Defined Application" or "UDA". These > > applications are not subject to standardization and are outside of > > the scope of this specification." > > > > Feel free to propose an additional text if you feel above is not > sufficient. > > > > thanks, > > Peter > > > > > > > > On 14/06/2020 21:22, Scott Bradner via Datatracker wrote: > >> Reviewer: Scott Bradner > >> Review result: Ready > >> I have reviewed the latest version of this document and my earlier > issues have > >> been resolved at least well enough for teh document to be considered > ready for > >> publication. > >> that said I still do not see where "User Defined Application > Identifier" is > >> actually cleanly defined - one can read carefully and determine but it > would be > >> easier on the reader to just say that it is a field that can be used to > >> indicate the use of one or more non-standard applications within some > scope > >> (network, subnet, link, organization, ... not sure what scopes are > meaningful > >> here but it does not seem that a User Defined Application Identifier > would be a > >> global (between network operators) value > >> Scott > > > > -- > > last-call mailing list > > last-call@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
