that looks just fine to me - thanks Scott > On Jun 15, 2020, at 5:14 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Scott. > > there is a following text in the OSPF draft: > > "On top of advertising the link attributes for standardized > applications, link attributes can be advertised for the purpose of > applications that are not standardized. We call such an > application a "User Defined Application" or "UDA". These > applications are not subject to standardization and are outside of > the scope of this specification." > > Feel free to propose an additional text if you feel above is not sufficient. > > thanks, > Peter > > > > On 14/06/2020 21:22, Scott Bradner via Datatracker wrote: >> Reviewer: Scott Bradner >> Review result: Ready >> I have reviewed the latest version of this document and my earlier issues have >> been resolved at least well enough for teh document to be considered ready for >> publication. >> that said I still do not see where "User Defined Application Identifier" is >> actually cleanly defined - one can read carefully and determine but it would be >> easier on the reader to just say that it is a field that can be used to >> indicate the use of one or more non-standard applications within some scope >> (network, subnet, link, organization, ... not sure what scopes are meaningful >> here but it does not seem that a User Defined Application Identifier would be a >> global (between network operators) value >> Scott > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
