On 2020-06-12, at 19:40, Mark Allman <mallman@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > > (i was confused because i wouldn't call these 'terminology' or > 'boilerplate' ... ugh ...) > >> try 2140bis s.2 para 1 > > yeah, i guess i can add an additional cite to draft The text you want to use is on page 3 of RFC 8174, which now is BCP 14 together with RFC 2119. >> 793bis needs updating too > > ??? > > 793 nor 793bis is cited, so nothing to update here No, but 793bis also uses the old boilerplate (totally unrelated comment). (Tom: When making comments to a draft, it helps to do those in a way that can be understood by the authors.) Grüße, Carsten -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call