Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/06/2020 13:59, Mark Allman wrote:

Terminology the boiler plate is out of date

???

<tp>

try  2140bis s.2 para 1
793bis needs updating too

Tom Petch

s,2
This document is different from from ...

fixed

Requirements
would be easier to refer to if they were R1, R2a or some such

i didn't make a change here; editorial discretion, i guess

a reference for DNS recursive resolver would be good

fixed

EWMA needs  expanding on first use

fixed

i can push these to a new version whenever.  i'll wait to hear
stewart's response to martin before doing so, however.

thanks,
allman




--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux