5: Perfect, I Don't even think about going back.
More easy to work, trace and follow. However, it is good to have both as well, so one highly formal Last-Call-List, and the other IETF-list can mix.
Best Regards
AB
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:17 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I forgot to
do when I sent it. Please reply to *this* message, to keep both lists
included.)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
> list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
> To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
> working.
>
> Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be helpful if the
> first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
> following 5-to-1 scale:
>
> 5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back!
> 4: I really like it and want to keep it.
> 3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
> 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it..
> 1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old way!
>
> And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
> include those as well. We want to know what you think. Comments,
> please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May. Thanks!
>
> Barry, for the IESG
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
