2. Strongly agree with Scott Kitterman's comments about looking at subscription (and posting) breakdowns and statistics as being more useful than polling and about the risk of making it more difficult for newcomers to figure out what is going on. I'd add that anyone who does significant automated local filtering or classification could do a 90% job by looking at "[Last Call]" in subject lines (as I have done for years) -- no separate list needed. Possibly the effort to create separate lists could be better spent pushing back on interminable discussions on the IETF list about, e.g., subjects that are not IETF problems. I expect I'm in the rough here, but still... best, john --On Thursday, April 30, 2020 11:15 -0400 Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I > forgot to do when I sent it. Please reply to *this* message, > to keep both lists included.) > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba > <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It's been around six months since we started the >> <last-call@xxxxxxxx> list, and we said that we would evaluate >> the results after six months. To that end, the IESG would >> like to see comments about how it's been working. >> >> Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be >> helpful if the first line of your comment gave a succinct >> view of your opinion on the following 5-to-1 scale: >> >> 5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back! >> 4: I really like it and want to keep it. >> 3: Neutral: I don't care either way. >> 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to >> keep it. 1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old >> way!
