Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.

I utilize last-call and am no longer subscribed to ietf@ - the signal is much better. Indeed its so obviously better I wouldn't go back if that were the only choice.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:17 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I forgot to
do when I sent it.  Please reply to *this* message, to keep both lists
included.)

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
> list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
> To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
> working.
>
> Please respond to this thread to comment.  It would be helpful if the
> first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
> following 5-to-1 scale:
>
> 5: Perfect!  Don't even think about going back!
> 4: I really like it and want to keep it.
> 3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
> 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it..
> 1: It's terrible!  Please, please go back to the old way!
>
> And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
> include those as well.  We want to know what you think.  Comments,
> please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May.  Thanks!
>
> Barry, for the IESG

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux