Re[2]: IPv6 addressing limitations (was "national security")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob Hinden writes:

>   2) For now, IANA should limit its allocation of IPv6 unicast
>      address space to the range of addresses that start with binary
>      value 001. The rest of the global unicast address space
>     (approximately 85% of the IPv6 address space) is reserved for future
>      definition and use, and is not to be assigned by IANA at this time.
>
> It was well understood that it was important to keep most of the IPv6 
> address space open to allow for future use.

If it were well understood, nobody would have ever been foolish enough
to suggest blowing 2^125 addresses right up front.  I've already
explained the folly of this in a previous post.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]