Re[2]: IPv6 addressing limitations (was "national security")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob Hinden writes:

> It was well understood that it was important to keep most of the IPv6
> address space open to allow for future use.

Why do we need 42,535,295,865,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
addresses right now, then?




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]