-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Keith Moore wrote: |>In many enterprise environments, this would be a feature not a bug. |>There are some webcams that are definitely inappropriate in a business |>setup; given the lack of good enterprise content filtering solutions for |>IM, if NAT does break IM webcams I don't have a problem with it. | | |>As of |>file transfer, it does not bother me either as like a lot of other |>network administrators I have a problem with users sharing their office |>computer files with anyone unknown on the net. | | |>For voice there's always |>that thing called the telephone that has the advantage to work all the | | | How nice for you to be able to determine what everyone else should be able | to run on their networks. |
Yeah. The level of clueloss boggles the mind.
MVH leifj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/zlIj8Jx8FtbMZncRAuK0AKC9pb1scpTssHJtSbWuwM/AV/zCugCeIK6N 9XAfBN0fpbRH8AZGIiSs4/A= =Rutg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----