> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu > > You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If > > - you don't see why a certificate that binds a name to a user is > > useless against spam unless it also certifies that the user has > > no other names. > > Actually, that one's kind of subtle, even I had to read it twice before I realized > that (a) almost all UFPSTTSP's pull a spectacular crash-n-burn on one of > the other criteria first, and (b) it's usually stated the other way around (left > as an exercise for the reader ;) I've tried to improve that one one as well as make other changes suggested by various people in http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html I'd be glad to hear more suggestions, but they should probably not involve this mailing list. Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com