Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:38:08 MDT, Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>  said:

>                 You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If

Man, you know how hard it is to get coca-cola off a laptop keyboard? ;)

(Fortunately, most of it missed the laptop.. ;)

>    - you don't see why a certificate that binds a name to a user is
>       useless against spam unless it also certifies that the user has
>       no other names.

Actually, that one's kind of subtle, even I had to read it twice before I realized
that (a) almost all UFPSTTSP's pull a spectacular crash-n-burn on one of
the other criteria first, and (b) it's usually stated the other way around (left
as an exercise for the reader ;) 

Attachment: pgp00301.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]