Re: Solving the right problems ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 08:41 AM 9/2/2003 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
>Vint,
>
>vgc> If you look at the instant messaging systems, they map a private
>vgc> identifier space (IM name or "handle") into IP addresses and
>vgc> apparently run background heartbeat to re-assign the mapping if the
>vgc> identifier in the heartbeat arrives in a packet with a different IP
>vgc> address than before -
>
>I was under the impression that they did not handle mobility nearly so
>dynamically or automatically. Rather, I seem to need to log in whenever
>I move. So they seem to do a login-time mapping. (On the other hand, the
>login for IM is usually automatic.)

no at least AIM tracks in real time


>In any event, I suspect that your domain name-based suggestion is the
>right one to pursue. That is, use DNS for the public, persistent name,
>and have a record that points to a dynamic address-mapping registry.
>(One might even think of mapping to a "presence" service...)
>
>Somehow, dynamic DNS does not seem like such a good idea, for anything
>that might change this much or this rapidly and serious host mobility.

agree



>d/
>--
> Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

Vint Cerf
SVP Technology Strategy
MCI
22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
Ashburn, VA 20147
703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
703 886 0047 fax
vinton.g.cerf@mci.com
www.mci.com/cerfsup 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]