Re: where the indirection layer belongs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith,

as one thinks about VPNs, tunneling, mobility and the like, assuming a week is probably a bad idea. 
Think a bit about the way AOL's IM tracks the binding of an IM handle to an IP address - it is quite dynamic.

Vint

At 05:07 PM 8/28/2003 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>IMHO, apps should be able to assume that an advertised address-host
>binding is valid for a minimum of a week.  This is a minimum - it
>should be longer whenever possible.  (however there's no requirement to
>maintain addresses longer than the nets will be accessible anyway -
>i.e., you don't expect the addresses for the ietf conference net to
>remain valid after the net is unplugged...but they shouldn't be reused
>within a week either.)

Vint Cerf
SVP Technology Strategy
MCI
22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
Ashburn, VA 20147
703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
703 886 0047 fax
vinton.g.cerf@mci.com
www.mci.com/cerfsup 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux