> In this light, I believe we need to start with generic requirements for XCON
> target systems (what should they be anyway?) and examine/compare the
> candidate protocols later. Such a document SHOULD be co-authored by (1)
> conferencing services providers first and (2) by conferencing platform
> vendors, second.
>
> Could we shift this debate from protocols to requirements?
something we can both agree on!
cheers,
/mtr