Marshall Rose [mailto:mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us] writes: > > However, the > > proposed solutions (all of which I expect to instantly > > be accepted as working group items in the case that the > > working group is chartered) demonstrate no such binding. > > ... > > accordingly, i think your statement regarding "rubber stamping" is > pointed in the wrong direction... in addition to the controversial > wording in the proposed charter, we now have an issue > regarding bias on the part of the proposed chairs... An understandable interpretation of my words (especially taken out of the context of the larger point I was trying to make), but not what I intended. That paragraph was intended to convey what I perceived the overall feel of the participants in the BOF to be. Any decisions, of course, will be taken to the working group for consensus. /a