Re: The requirements cycle (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual....)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott,

SWB> This is wayyy too abstract and theoretical.  

Unfortunately, it was intentional.

I was sufficiently surprised that anyone would blame the working group
for failing to overcome inappropriate barriers, imposed by management
that I fell into academic mode, to try to moderate the reaction.

So, try just the end of my note:

>> Blame the folks doing the imposing.
>> 
>> Or, to state this more constructively, do not focus on the people who
>> become discouraged by external forces that are... discouraging.
>> 
>> Focus in getting those forces turned into something constructive.


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]