Re: The requirements cycle (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual....)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is wayyy too abstract and theoretical.  

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 05:53:41PM +0200, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote:
> Harald,
> 
> HTA> even if a WG feels abused by the IESG, or its AD, that's no excuse for a WG
> HTA> not fighting back - in this case, by rapidly removing the IESG's apparent
> HTA> excuses for delay.
> 
> HTA> Dejection is an explanation, not an excuse.
> 
> 
> This seems to reflect a view of human behavior that might work well for
> machines, but not for humans.  When people in positions of authority
> impose situations that are silly, wasteful, damaging, etc., those on
> whom they are imposed usually view them as silly, wasteful, damaging, etc.
> 
> When people believe their actions are s/w/d/... they have a reaction
> that is generally called "natural".  A typical result of this reaction
> is de-motivation.
> 
> We might applaud those who can overcome this natural process, but we
> should never lame those who do not.
> 
> Blame the folks doing the imposing.
> 
> Or, to state this more constructively, do not focus on the people who
> become discouraged by external forces that are... discouraging.
> 
> Focus in getting those forces turned into something constructive.
> 
> 
> d/
> --
>  Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>  Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>
> 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]