Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Exactly. A NAPT (not a NA(!P)T ......) is in fact a perfectly good firewall* for the home user. So all this argumentation that a "NAPT is not a firewall" is bunk.

* where firewall = a device that protect my internal net from external threats

simon

On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 03:46 AM, Daniel Senie wrote:

A $50 NAPT box (using terminology from the NAT WG's terminology RFC) provides sufficient firewalling and purposeful interruption of applications for the typical DSL or cable modem user. It runs somewhere OTHER than on the user's computer, so when a virus gets in and tries to disable the user's firewall software, less damage is > done.


-- www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]