Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com> writes:

> Eric Rescorla writes:
>  > What applications that people want to run--and the IT managers would
>  > want to enable--are actually inhibited by NAT? It seems to me that
>  > most of the applications inconvenienced by NAT are ones that IT
>  > managers would want to screen off anyway.
> 
> Uh, have you paid no attention to voice? It
> qualifies on both counts. We get complaints from
> customers each and every day... the ones that are
> lucky enough to figure out that NAT is why their
> IP phone doesn't work that is.

As I said, these would be screened off by corporate firewalls in most
cases anyway.

-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr@rtfm.com]
                http://www.rtfm.com/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]