Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not at all.

If you want to address denial of service issues you need protocol
enforcement points.

The INTERnet is a bidging architecture between networks. Lets put asside the
dogma and build the infrastucture the users need.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keith Moore
Sent:	Wed Jun 18 09:47:42 2003
To:	Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc:	moore@cs.utk.edu; pbaker@verisign.com; Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org;
aarsenau@bbn.com; ietf@ietf.org
Subject:	Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department
forma lly adopts IPv6)

> I really wish that the IETF
> had designed a decent NAT box spec

that's an oxymoron.  the basic premis of NAT is fundamnetally broken.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]