on 6/18/2003 5:37 PM Keith Moore wrote: > you're simply wrong about that, at least for anything resembling > today's NATs. except for a shortage of IPv4 addresses, NATs would not > be needed at all. ...and a routing grid that could handle a squared table size. No use in opening allocations to everybody that can justify ~/29 if filters are still going to be dropping everything after /20. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/