Did anyone decide there was an error here, or is this draft really in IETF last call? Thanks Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@movaz.com> To: <iesg@ietf.org>; <ietf@ietf.org> Cc: <mpls@UU.NET> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:23 PM Subject: Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard > With respect, this draft doesn't appear to have been through WG last call > (unless I was sleeping, but I can't find any reference in the mail archive). > > It was only published as a WG draft on 5/7/2003 (despite carrying a date of > February 2003). > > While I support the draft, I would like to see it discussed on the mailing list > and go through WG last call. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > To: <IETF-Announce: ;> > Cc: <mpls@UU.NET> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:59 PM > Subject: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard > > > > --------------- > > The IESG has received a request from Multiprotocol Label Switching to > > consider the following Internet-Draft(s) as Draft Standard. > > o Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS): LDP DoD Graceful Restart > > <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-restart-00.txt> > > Draft Standard > > > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the > > iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by . > > > > Files can be obtained via > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-restart-00.txt > > > >