> Paul Vixie wrote: > warning, i'm answering an obvious troll from an obvious spammer. > hit D now. Yeah I think we should work on a system to ban obvious spammers from IETF lists. Maybe we should also ban people that are so full of it that they could double as a sceptic tank such as the ones that try to convey the idea that handling spam has no cost. Paul, I'm curious: why are you wasting your time with this? Any withdrawals from not fighting it on a daily basis? > oops! my t1 costs me $552 per month in pac bell service fees. > so maybe i'm already expecting a "premium channel" since nobody > is subsidizing my costs. But you do have a "premium channel". Do you realize that your connection is 50 times faster than a dial-up so you are entitled to receive 50 times more spam than mere mortals? I think you don't realize what you are missing: did you know for example that you could enhance your breasts by 2 cup sizes? What a fascinating thought :-) Michel.