Re: Joint legal/technical anti-spam effort

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 May 2003 11:14:24 CDT, "Eric A. Hall" said:

> Bulk-mailers as senders are a small enough scope that forced upgrades
> within a grace-period window is feasible.

The people that are the problem have a horrible tendency to not follow
the *CURRENT* RFCs (things like ignoring MX records, syntactically borked
MAIL FROM:, the whole gamut).

What makes you think they'd upgrade to software that would diminish their
ability to spam people who didn't want to be spammed?

Attachment: pgp00231.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]