Re: Joint legal/technical anti-spam effort

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu

> > Bulk-mailers as senders are a small enough scope that forced upgrades
> > within a grace-period window is feasible.
>
> The people that are the problem have a horrible tendency to not follow
> the *CURRENT* RFCs (things like ignoring MX records, syntactically borked
> MAIL FROM:, the whole gamut).
>
> What makes you think they'd upgrade to software that would diminish their
> ability to spam people who didn't want to be spammed?

See also standards track RFC 2919 which is supposed to identify bulk
mail and which this mailing list does not follow.


Vernon Schryver    vjs@rhyolite.com


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]