On Mon, 26 May 2003 00:56:19 CDT, "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com> said: > - RCPT TO response codes signifying acceptance levels, EG: > - 250 (default) what the law allows by default > - 255 (stiff) no solicitations at all > - 259 (extreme) no trespassing -- authorized senders only > - 25x allows interoperability but other codes may be more useful, (a) this isn't usefully backwards-compatible - it only helps if you're talking to another upgraded MTA. As such, given the usual glacial upgrade speed, this isn't a short-term solution. > - especially considering different jurisdictions will likely need > their own codes See Don Eastlake's I-D: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-xxx-05.txt You're looking at a lot of the same issues.
Attachment:
pgp00229.pgp
Description: PGP signature