Re: site-local != NAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> There is no inherent requirement that SL addresses be ambiguous, and
> there are several drafts out there on how to ensure they're not. 

for that matter, there's no inherent requirement that there be any 
set of addresses that is defined in the architecture to be filtered at
some arbitrary boundary.  in other words, there's no inherent
requirement for SLs at all.  

Keith


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]