> | site local is, in fact, an addition to the IP architecture and > | that is what is causing the controversy. > > No, it isn't. It is a cleaned up replacement for 1918 addresses. which by itself is reason enough to kill it.
> | site local is, in fact, an addition to the IP architecture and > | that is what is causing the controversy. > > No, it isn't. It is a cleaned up replacement for 1918 addresses. which by itself is reason enough to kill it.