Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
Subject: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:07:13 -0500
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030326214007.01b67320@mail.amaranth.net>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

Could we PLEASE leave NAT out of the equation? Not all hosts in the world want or need to be connected outside of the corporate network they belong to.

true. but they still need unique addresses.

References:
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
  - From: Daniel Senie

Prev by Date: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Next by Date: RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...
Previous by thread: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Next by thread: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]