On Wednesday, Feb 12, 2003, at 13:24 America/Montreal, Mallikarjun C. wrote:
In the context of an *Internet* RFC, it seems sensible to use the normalAll the Internet documentation with which I am familiar, as well as theI think we have a case of overlapping vocabulary from two different domains.
Per SCSI Architecture Model (SAM-2, SAM-3), iSCSI is very clearly
a "SCSI transport protocol" (as opposed to a SCSI application layer protocol).
Parallel SCSI, Fibre Channel etc. are all "SCSI transports" per SCSI conventions.
That is all the critiqued abstract is trying to describe.
Internet terminology -- unless one very very clearly indicates that a
term is being used in some different semantic. One might postulate that
the document's editors and RFC-Editor could work out a mutually agreeable
editorial change here to add clarity.
Ran