Perry E. Metzger wrote: >John Stracke <jstracke@centivinc.com> writes: > > >>Mmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches. It'd be much >>more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the >>recipient's filters. >> >Are you kidding? They've been doing thing to explicitly evade filters >for years now. For example, ever notice groups of random characters at >the end of spam Subject: lines? > > A spammer can claim that those there for legitimate technical reasons, to help them to track responses/bounces. Sending 1000 messages gets harder to justify. -- /===========================================\ |John Stracke |jstracke@centivinc.com | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com| |Centiv |My opinions are my own. | |===========================================| |"Who died and made you king?" "My father." | \===========================================/