stanislav shalunov wrote: >One can imagine 1000 sets of decoy words for different categories of >people, with each message sent by the spammer in 1000 copies (so, you >might get it in 0 copies if you're very unusual -- or in 50 copies if >you discuss fishing, computer networking, investing, travel, and such >other categories in email regularly and the spammer has decoy lists >for fishing, etc.). > > Mmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches. It'd be much more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the recipient's filters. Sending me one message customized to get through can masquerade as free expression; sending me 1000 is a dictionary attack on my security. At that point, spammers will start going to jail. >If Javascript >works in the recipient's MUA, then you have > > ...an idiotic MUA. (Yeah, I know I'm using one that supports it; but it's turned off.) -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke |jstracke@centivinc.com | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com | |Centiv |My opinions are my own. | |=================================================================| |Vote for Ron, and nobody gets hurt! --actual campaign poster from| |Chicago | \=================================================================/