John Stracke <jstracke@centivinc.com> writes: > Mmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches. It'd be much > more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the > recipient's filters. Are you kidding? They've been doing thing to explicitly evade filters for years now. For example, ever notice groups of random characters at the end of spam Subject: lines? those are there to evade some of the early filtering techniques based on having trap addresses that got spam and rapidly distributed block lists based on what arrived. -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com -- "Ask not what your country can force other people to do for you..."