Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb@rp.asomi.net> writes:
> My initial minimalist approach is to propose a standard
> whereby the source of an email can be authenticated,
> allowing receivers and relayers the option of rejecting or
> simply segregating email without authenticated sources.

Thus leading to masses of authenticated spam? Anyone can generate an
RSA key. There are enough primes out there that you can generate one
for each piece of spam and still never run out. :)

> Attempts to *classify* mail as "unsolicited" will only
> result in years of debate as to which groups are entitled to
> exemptions -- witness the debates on telemarketing rules.

And yet the laws on junk faxing have, largely, stopped junk faxes. One
of the nice things about laws is that, being interpreted by human
beings, they need not be perfect, just good enough that the intent is
obvious.

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com
--
"Ask not what your country can force other people to do for you..."


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]